Stop "trying ChatGPT" on the side. We install working AI agents into the boring parts of your business — quoting, follow-ups, intake, scheduling, support — so the work runs while you sleep.
The offerings brought forward to the altar, transformed, and returned. You bring us the work. We transform it. It returns as time.
Three reasons "trying AI" hasn't worked yet — and why doing more of the same won't change anything.
ChatGPT Pro. Maybe Copilot too. They opened it once, asked it a question, and never came back. Now it's a $200/month line item your bookkeeper keeps asking about.
You don't need a 40-page PDF. You need the email follow-up agent live by Friday and the contract generator working before next renewal cycle.
Quoting, intake, scheduling, reporting, support — the same dozen tasks burn 20+ hours of payroll a week. The "we should look into AI" tab has been open for eleven months.
DIY toolkit, single-agent build, or full sprint. Same brand, same playbook, three commitment levels. We'd rather you ship something than be stuck waiting for a consultant.
For builders who'd rather spend a weekend with a guide than write a check.
For operators with one workflow that's killing them — and no $24k or 90 days to spare.
For owners who want the whole back-office handled before next quarter ends.
A done-for-you sprint that finds, builds, and embeds AI agents into the five highest-ROI workflows in your business — so the work runs itself before the quarter ends.
No training videos. No 40-page slide decks. Just working software, embedded in the tools you already use, owned by your team within 90 days. Every line below shows what it would cost to do it yourself, calculated against burdened NV/CA labor rates so you can verify the math against your own P&L.
Complete task-level audit of your team. We find every minute AI can recover, score it by ROI, and hand you a one-page rollout plan. Yours to keep regardless of what comes next.
We build, test, and ship five agents into your stack — quoting, follow-ups, intake, reporting, support, whatever wins biggest. Real working software, not "here's how you could prompt ChatGPT."
QuickBooks, HubSpot, Jobber, PandaDoc, Gmail, Slack, Shopify, your CRM — we wire it in. Run on Excel and Gmail? That works fine. Many of our best builds connect directly to spreadsheets.
Loom walkthroughs and written SOPs your team will actually use. We train your operators in the language they already speak — no jargon, no "AI literacy" lectures.
Slack channel and weekly check-ins. When something breaks — and something always breaks the first month — a human fixes it fast. Not a ticket queue, not a chatbot.
We hand you the next three quarters of AI initiatives, ranked by ROI, so you never wonder "what's next?" Compounding gains, planned out.
No fine print. No "well, technically." Bring us the work. We return the hours. That's the whole agreement.
A business that runs the boring stuff itself. You focus on growth, family, and what you got into this for.
Done-for-you build, 90 days of support, money-back guarantee. We carry the risk so you don't have to.
First agent live in 14 days. Full sprint complete in 90. ROI before the contract finishes printing.
About two hours a week from you. Mostly answering "yes, that's right" and "no, do this instead."
Three different sizes, three different industries, three different price points. Every calculation uses NV/CA burdened labor rates so you can verify against your own P&L.
A Northern Nevada snow removal company had 1,000+ commercial contracts to renew each season. The owner and one admin had been spending two months — every year — cleaning contract data, generating personalized contracts in PandaDoc, and sending them out one at a time. PandaDoc priced well and worked fine for templates, but it didn't have the automation depth they needed for contracts at this volume.
We spent two days building an agent that handled data cleanup, contract generation, and email dispatch — feeding directly into their existing PandaDoc setup. No platform switch. No new tool to learn. The next renewal cycle ran in a single day with minimal human review.
The owner got two months of his year back.
| per renewal cycle · formula | old way (manual) | new way (automated) |
|---|---|---|
| Owner @ $100/hr opportunity cost · hrs | $100 × 120 hrs = $12,000 | $100 × 0.5 hr = $50 |
| Admin @ $24 base + $8.40 burden (35%) = $32.40/hr · hrs | $32.40 × 240 hrs = $7,776 | $32.40 × 0.5 hr = $16 |
| Total per cycle | $19,776 | $66 |
The estimator was supposed to follow up on quotes, but only got to about 30% of them on time. Quotes older than 48 hours closed at 11%. Quotes followed up within 2 hours closed at 34%. The gap between intended and actual follow-up was costing them roughly $40,000/month in lost deals.
The build: an AI agent watching for new quotes (whether they live in estimating software, Gmail, or a spreadsheet), drafting personalized follow-ups within 4 minutes, sending after the estimator approves, then nurturing cold quotes for 60 days with seasonal trigger messages.
This is a representative example built to illustrate typical ROI for HVAC operators in this size range. We can share real client work under NDA on the audit call.
| annualized impact · formula | calculation | annual |
|---|---|---|
| Estimator @ $40 base + $16 burden (40%) = $56/hr · hrs/wk × 52 | $56 × 9 × 52 | $26,208 |
| Close-rate lift · added closes/mo × avg ticket × 12 | 6 × $7,800 × 12 | +$561,600 |
| Combined annualized impact | — | $587,808 |
A small services business had a part-time bookkeeper spending 4 hours every week on a recurring categorization and reconciliation task in QuickBooks. About 90% of the transactions were the same recurring vendors and patterns every week — exactly the kind of repetitive pattern AI handles cleanly.
We built a simple rules engine + QuickBooks integration that auto-categorizes the obvious 90% and flags the 10% edge cases for human review. Three hours of work. $497 invoice.
Not every problem needs a sprint. Some need a screwdriver. We bring whichever the situation calls for.
| annualized · formula | calculation | annual |
|---|---|---|
| Bookkeeper @ $27 base + $9.45 burden (35%) = $36.45/hr · before | $36.45 × 4 × 52 | $7,582 |
| Same rate · after automation (~25 min/wk review) | $36.45 × 0.42 × 52 | $796 |
| Annual savings | — | $6,786 |
I'd been "going to do AI" for 18 months. They had our agent live in two days. It paid for itself before the first invoice cleared.Owner, Northern Nevada services co.
Other consultants sold us slides. These guys shipped working software into my business. Different sport entirely.Managing Partner, regional firm
No mystery. No surprises. Here's exactly how the next quarter unfolds when you say yes.
We map your workflows and identify the 5 highest-ROI AI opportunities. You get the plan even if we don't work together.
We start building agent #1 within 72 hours of green-light. First agent ships live to your team within 14 days.
Agents 2–5 ship in waves. Each wired into your existing tools, tested with your real data, adopted by your team.
SOPs, training, and a 12-month forward roadmap so you keep compounding gains long after we're gone.
Everything skeptical owners ask before they sign. We've heard them all.
If you're under $1M/yr in revenue, the $24k sprint probably doesn't pencil — but the $497 toolkit might. Between $1M and $25M is the sprint sweet spot: enough volume of repetitive work that AI pays for itself in weeks, small enough that we can ship without 9 months of compliance review.
Perfect. Most of our best work is with teams who think a "tech stack" is the shelf where the iPad chargers go. The agents we build live inside the tools your team already uses — Gmail, your CRM, QuickBooks, even Excel. They don't have to learn anything new. The work just starts getting done.
Yes — and you're not as far behind as you think. Some of our cleanest builds connect directly to spreadsheets, because spreadsheets are surprisingly good systems of record once an agent is reading and writing to them. You don't need to "upgrade your stack" first. We'll meet you where you are.
Every agent we ship has guardrails: human-in-the-loop on anything customer-facing, sandboxed access to your systems, a kill switch you can hit from your phone. We've shipped over $10M in cumulative client savings with zero customer-facing incidents. Our reputation is on the line — we're not interested in being the cautionary tale.
A developer builds what you tell them to build. We tell you what to build, then build it, then train your team to run it — all under a 90-day money-back guarantee. A senior dev costs $180k/yr and takes 3 months to ship the first thing. We ship the first thing in 14 days, for less than a quarter of one developer's annual salary.
Great. Those are the tools. We build the system that uses them — the prompts, the integrations, the workflows, the SOPs, the safeguards. Owning ChatGPT and expecting your business to transform is like owning a hammer and expecting a house. The hammer is necessary; it isn't sufficient.
Exactly what it says. If we haven't recovered at least 20 hours/week of measurable team time within 90 days of kickoff, we keep building, fixing, and supporting at no additional cost until we do — or you get every dollar back. We measure the hours together, in a shared dashboard, with timestamps. No "well, technically." Hours back, or you don't pay.
Yes — and many people do. The toolkit is the same playbook we use internally. If you have 40-80 hours over the next month and some technical comfort, you can absolutely build your first agent from it. Most operators who buy it ship one agent, see the impact, then upgrade to a Build or Sprint. A few build all five and never need us. Both outcomes are wins. We'd rather you have a business that runs itself than be stuck waiting for a consultant.
Simple decision tree. Toolkit ($497) if you want to learn, you have a weekend, and you're willing to ship one or two agents yourself — most useful for businesses under $1.5M. Single Agent Build ($5,997) if you have one specific workflow that's killing you and you want it solved this month — most useful for $1.5M–$5M businesses or for Sprint-curious owners who want a low-risk first project. Sprint ($24k) if you want your whole back office handled in 90 days with a money-back guarantee — most useful for $3M–$25M businesses ready to commit. And remember: the Single Agent Build credits 100% toward the Sprint within 90 days, so the middle tier is also a low-risk way to evaluate the full engagement.
That's literally what the discovery call is for. We'll spend 60 minutes mapping your operations, finding the workflow with the highest ROI-to-build-effort ratio, and confirming it's a fit before we touch anything. If we don't find a workflow that obviously pencils, we'll tell you — and refund the discovery time. Most often the answer is one of: quote follow-up, document/contract generation, intake routing, or recurring data work. We've seen the patterns.
Take our personalized AI audit. Answer ~20 questions about how your business actually runs. We'll calculate the dollar value AI could recover for each workflow — using NV/CA burdened labor rates so the math actually pencils against your P&L.